Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Munoz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 204.682 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,660 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Munoz is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Brian Munoz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
27.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos