Author summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 6,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Nierman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,451 hits . Analysis detected 12,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,219 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,550 of 6,365 authors). This Meredith Nierman is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Meredith Nierman
Author details
Total words: 14,219
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst