Topic summary
11% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phishing results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,419 hits . Analysis detected 14,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,813 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,071 of 15,839 topics). This Phishing is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Phishing
Topic details
Total words: 22,813
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles22.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst