Author summary
74% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Long results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,478 hits . Analysis detected 10,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,639 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,852 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Long is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Emily Long
Author details
Total words: 10,639
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 23.3%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst