Topic summary
75%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmacy Benefit Management results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,701 of 16,562 topics). This Pharmacy Benefit Management is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Pharmacy Benefit Management
Topic details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.0%21.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.3%17.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos