Topic summary
⁠10%2 analyzed articles/videos1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmacology results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 694 hits. Analysis detected 4,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,072 of 15,447 topics). This Pharmacology is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Pharmacology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,240
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos