Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Magyar results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 8,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,204 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,741 of 15,760 topics). This Peter Magyar is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Peter Magyar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,204
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.9%15.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos