Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jakub Krupa results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,023 hits . Analysis detected 6,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,650 of 6,346 authors). This Jakub Krupa is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Jakub Krupa
Author details
Total words: 6,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst