Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter Kyle results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 2,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Peter Kyle is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Peter Kyle
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos