Topic summary
⁠38%3 analyzed articles/videos1,570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Personal Care results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,303 hits. Analysis detected 8,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,926 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,401 of 16,562 topics). This Personal Care is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Personal Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,926
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos