Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pentagon's Ai Procurement results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Pentagon's Ai Procurement is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pentagon's Ai Procurement
Topic details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.7%36.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos