Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Peace Treaties results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 841 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,780 topics). This Peace Treaties is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Peace Treaties
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles484 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.0%36.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.9%40.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 20.0%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos