Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Payroll Scheme results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 2,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,112 of 16,562 topics). This Payroll Scheme is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Payroll Scheme
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.4%32.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos