Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paxton Vs Cornyn results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,193 of 15,967 topics). This Paxton Vs Cornyn is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Paxton Vs Cornyn
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos