Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parking Regulations results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 2,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,370 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,437 of 15,968 topics). This Parking Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Parking Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,370
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Middle Ground: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos