Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parental Control results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 3,222 hits. Analysis detected 15,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,586 of 16,562 topics). This Parental Control is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Parental Control
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠12%Parental Control (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 20,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos