Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palestine Israel Conflict results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,475 hits. Analysis detected 9,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,527 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,439 of 16,562 topics). This Palestine Israel Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Palestine Israel Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 9,527
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos