Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Tatlow-Devally results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 1,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,371 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,017 of 6,340 authors). This Daniel Tatlow-Devally is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Daniel Tatlow-Devally
Author details
Total words: 4,371
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst