Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Outbreak Investigation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,451 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Outbreak Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Outbreak Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,451
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos