Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Organizational Change results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 608 hits. Analysis detected 5,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,840 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,298 of 16,250 topics). This Organizational Change is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Organizational Change
Topic details
Total words: 5,840
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos