Topic summary
⁠2%2 analyzed articles/videos355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Lottery results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Blind-Spot Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (19,974 of 22,768 topics). This Oregon Lottery is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Oregon Lottery
Topic details
Total words: 1,420
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos