BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 11 faulty-reasoning hits from 205 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (27,752 of 27,985 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

The Oregon Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. 
Here's a look at Aug. 1, 2026, results for each game: 
Winning Powerball numbers from Aug. 1 drawing 
06-17-27-48-50, Powerball: 05, Power Play: 3 
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here. 
Winning Pick 4 numbers from Aug. 1 drawing 
1PM: 0-2-2-7 
4PM: 0-5-8-9 
7PM: 1-3-7-1 
10PM: 8-9-1-0 
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here. 
Winning Win for Life numbers from Aug. 1 drawing 
14-23-29-36 
Check Win for Life payouts and previous drawings here. 
Winning Megabucks numbers from Aug. 1 drawing 
07-17-18-19-29-43 
Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here. 
Feeling lucky? 
Explore the latest lottery news & results 
When are the Oregon Lottery drawings held? 
* Powerball: 7:59 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday. 
* Mega Millions: 7:59 p.m. on Tuesday and Friday. 
* Pick 4: 1 p.m., 4 p.m., 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. daily. 
* Win for Life: 7:30 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday. 
* Megabucks: 7:29 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday. 
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by an Oregon editor. 
You can send feedback using this form. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 5.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 2.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.0%Statesman Journal: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion1.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Statesman Journal: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

205 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.