Oregon Lottery Pick 4 results for Aug. 2 6%

8/2/2026, 10:30:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Blind-Spot Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,495 of 27,986 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the article peer group.

The Oregon Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. 
Here's a look at Aug. 2, 2026, results for each game: 
Winning Pick 4 numbers from Aug. 2 drawing 
1PM: 9-4-9-4 
4PM: 5-4-5-1 
7PM: 2-8-4-2 
10PM: 9-0-5-8 
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here. 
Feeling lucky? 
Explore the latest lottery news & results 
When are the Oregon Lottery drawings held? 
* Powerball: 7:59 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday. 
* Mega Millions: 7:59 p.m. on Tuesday and Friday. 
* Pick 4: 1 p.m., 4 p.m., 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. daily. 
* Win for Life: 7:30 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday. 
* Megabucks: 7:29 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday. 
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by an Oregon editor. 
You can send feedback using this form. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Statesman Journal: 1.6%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Statesman Journal: 1.9%Optimism Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 5.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Statesman Journal: 2.2%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.3%Statesman Journal: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion1.3%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.7%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.7%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.3%Statesman Journal: 0.7%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Statesman Journal: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Statesman Journal: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.0%

150 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.