Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Epic Fury results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,726 hits. Analysis detected 16,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,904 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,516 of 16,562 topics). This Operation Epic Fury is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Operation Epic Fury
Topic details
Total words: 9,904
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos