Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariel Zilber results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,500 hits . Analysis detected 10,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,548 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,127 of 6,628 authors). This Ariel Zilber is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Ariel Zilber
Author details
Total words: 8,548
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst