Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Open Source Philosophy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Biased Writer Voice, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 3,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Open Source Philosophy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Open Source Philosophy
Topic details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos