Windows Central67%
"The solution is not to put your head in the sand," says Linux creator Linus Torvalds as he puts his foot firmly down against anti-AI comments 62%
By Richard Devine67%
7/16/2026, 1:02:22 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 1,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 799 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,343 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the article peer group.
"The solution is not to put your head in the sand," says Linux creator Linus Torvalds as he puts his foot firmly down against anti-AI comments
The day when AI isn't completely polarizing feels like it'll never arrive, and there's a definite divide between those for and those against.
This drama has now spilled into the Linux kernel, prompting a lengthy and firm response from its creator, Linus Torvalds (via GamingOnLinux ).
It emerged as a topic referencing using AI and a tool called "Sashiko" for agentic reviews of changes to the Linux kernel.
Then in swoops Torvalds to firmly put his foot down.
The full transcript of his response is below:
And no, that's not the position of the Linux kernel.
I realize that some people really dislike AI, but this is an area where I'm willing to absolutely put my foot down as the top-level maintainer.
Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects, and if somebody has issues with that, they can do the open-source thing and fork it.
AI is a tool, just like other tools we use.
And it's clearly a useful one.
It may not have been that "clearly" even just a year ago, but it's no longer in question today.
There are other questions around AI (like what the economy of it will actually look like in the end), but "is it useful" is no longer one of those questions.
Anybody who doubts that clearly hasn't actually used it.
Yes, it can also be a somewhat painful tool, both for maintainer workloads and just from a "it keeps finding embarrassing bugs" standpoint.
But the solution is not to put your head in the sand and sing "La La La, I can't hear you" at the top of your voice like some people seem to do.
The solution is to make sure those LLM tools _help_ maintainers instead of just causing them pain.
There's no question on that side.
We're not forcing anybody to use it, but I will very loudly ignore people who try to argue against other people from using it.
And no, AI isn't perfect.
But Christ, anybody who points to the problems at AI had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at themselves at the same time.
Because it's not like natural intelligence is always all that great either.
The kernel project has been and will continue to be about the technology.
Sure, the social angle of working on open source is important and often a very motivating part of the project, but in the end that's a side benefit, not the _point_ of the project.
This is *NOT* some kind of "social warrior" project, never has been, and never will be.
In the kernel community we do open source because it results in better technology, not because of religious reasons.
And so we make decisions primarily based on technical merit.
Not fear of new tools.
Linux is not a "social warrior" project.
(Image credit: Windows Central) I can already see the pitchforks rising, but let's take a step back.
While Torvalds does appear to be flexing some muscle, if you read carefully, he's also not actually advocating for AI .
"AI is a tool...
And clearly a useful one."
There's no ideology behind it.
He's not suddenly saying that the Linux kernel is going to be built using AI.
More that if it can be used to make certain parts of the process better, then it will be.
And as he says, human intelligence isn't exactly perfect, is it?
It's a sticky wicket and sure to provoke some discussion.
Linux is where many of the most serious enthusiasts go, and plenty just have a fundamental opposition to AI.
I'm not getting into that, because it's exhausting, and we've been round and round on the topic plenty.
I do like Torvalds' approach in addressing this, though.
Unlike, say, Microsoft, there are no business interests to push and bank accounts to swell by pushing the general public into using AI.
There's also an alternative; if you don't like it, you can fork it and make your own.
There are already plenty of custom kernels on Linux.
He's simply being pragmatic.
The genie is free from the lamp; AI is here, and ignoring it simply isn't an option.
Everyone can have their own opinion, but as he states, Linux isn't a "social warrior" project.
They're just trying to make the best software, and increasingly, that's going to mean folks leveraging AI.
Like it or not.
Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.
Speakers
1speaker48%attributed speech416writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
99%flagged-word coverageLinus Torvalds
383 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.