Topic summary
48%3 analyzed articles/videos621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Software Development results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 8,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,611 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,576 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Software Development is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Ai In Software Development
Topic details
Total words: 8,611
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate