Topic summary
â 0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Radicalization results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 2,878 hits . Analysis detected 18,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,293 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 35% (10,782 of 16,562 topics). This Online Radicalization is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Online Radicalization
Topic details
Total words: 16,293
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.6% 13.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst