Topic summary
81%3 analyzed articles/videos2,606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Privacy results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 693 hits. Analysis detected 8,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,980 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,289 of 16,562 topics). This Online Privacy is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Online Privacy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,980
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate