Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Online Predators results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 3,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,472 topics). This Online Predators is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Online Predators
Topic details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos