Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Online Harms results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 3,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Online Harms is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Online Harms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.1%18.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos