Topic summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Gambling results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Recency Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 3,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,051 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,104 of 16,562 topics). This Online Gambling is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Online Gambling
Topic details
Total words: 4,051
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst