Topic summary
⁠86%4 analyzed articles/videos2,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Markets results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,609 hits. Analysis detected 12,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,583 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,478 of 15,448 topics). This Oil Markets is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Oil Markets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,583
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos