Topic summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 3,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,471 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,491 of 16,562 topics). This Ohio Politics is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Ohio Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,471
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos