Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Kasler results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 128 hits . Analysis detected 620 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,095 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,963 of 6,279 authors). This Karen Kasler is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Karen Kasler
Author details
Total words: 1,095
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 11.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst