Topic summary
37% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Power results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,277 hits . Analysis detected 10,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,055 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,337 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Power is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Nuclear Power
Topic details
Total words: 14,055
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst