Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 7,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,693 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,666 of 16,090 topics). This Nuclear is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Nuclear
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos