Topic summary
⁠5%3 analyzed articles/videos1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Npr results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 2,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,439 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (15,887 of 16,241 topics). This Npr is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751002.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos