Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Atlantic Treaty Organization results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 4,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,486 of 16,562 topics). This North Atlantic Treaty Organization is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos