Topic summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Management results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 781 hits. Analysis detected 5,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,248 of 16,562 topics). This Nonprofit Management is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Nonprofit Management
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠14%Nonprofit Management (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 8,388
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos