Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 1,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,442 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,761 of 16,231 topics). This Nonprofit is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Nonprofit
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,442
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos