Topic summary
⁠36%3 analyzed articles/videos2,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nolan Wells results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 718 hits. Analysis detected 4,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,460 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,175 of 15,760 topics). This Nolan Wells is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Nolan Wells
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,460
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
025507510010.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos