Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Fuentes results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 2,477 hits. Analysis detected 19,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,483 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,018 of 16,562 topics). This Nick Fuentes is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Nick Fuentes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,483
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
5.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.6%19.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.1%26.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos