Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nhl Playoffs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,294 hits. Analysis detected 10,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,256 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,955 of 16,562 topics). This Nhl Playoffs is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Nhl Playoffs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,256
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos