Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Canadian Press results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 557 hits . Analysis detected 6,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,882 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (5,116 of 6,628 authors). This The Canadian Press is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. The Canadian Press
Author details
Total words: 9,882
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst