Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Betting results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 1,463 hits. Analysis detected 9,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,713 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,200 of 15,758 topics). This Nfl Betting is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Nfl Betting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,713
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Special Pleading: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos