Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Governor Race results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 1,263 hits. Analysis detected 11,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,064 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,508 of 15,346 topics). This New York Governor Race is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
New York Governor Race
Topic details
Total words: 5,064
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
6.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 17.7%17.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 14.5%14.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos