Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These New Species Discovery results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,302 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This New Species Discovery is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New Species Discovery
Topic details
Total words: 4,302
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos