Topic summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos3,709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neurodiversity results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,880 hits. Analysis detected 14,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,242 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,861 of 16,313 topics). This Neurodiversity is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Neurodiversity

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos